WIND
3Dragoness the Wicked Knight
ATK:
1200
DEF:
900
View:
3133
"Armaill" + "One-Eyed Shield Dragon"
Dragoness the Wicked Knight — Power Evaluation
Final Score: 39 ± 12 · Confidence: Low
- Intrinsic: 40 · Deck: 39 · Meta: provisional
- Primary role: Utility · Secondary: Material body
Why it scores here
The evidence supplies only the fusion material line ('Armaill' + 'One-Eyed Shield Dragon') and no effect text, so the card's conversion value cannot be verified and is scored conservatively. It runs in 400 of 400 sampled decks at 1 copy, spread across 82 archetypes, but it has zero recorded combo boards and is not a Top Card, so the deck count confirms it is playable and not that it is strong. The 1200 ATK and the 100% inclusion in two usage archetypes were not used to raise the score.
Axis scores
| Axis | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 45 | Fusion-only access needs two specific materials, and the 400/400 deck inclusion shows the line is played in practice, but no combo data confirms starter or searched roles (observed; the route itself is inferred). |
| Combo & Conversion | 25 | Zero combo appearances and no examples, so nothing measures what the card builds; the score is text-only and low (inferred). |
| Resource Economy | 35 | No effect text is supplied, so no draw, search, or recursion value can be confirmed; a neutral-low default is used (inferred). |
| Effect & Interaction | 25 | No negation, removal, or hand-trap text is supplied and no combo or guide evidence shows interaction (inferred, speculation excluded). |
| Material Utility | 30 | Materials are only the two named cards; the card's own value as material for other summons is not evidenced (inferred). |
| Resilience & Flexibility | 35 | Recurrence across 82 archetypes shows portability (observed), but nothing shows it survives interaction (inferred). |
| Deck-Building Efficiency | 50 | Single-copy Extra Deck slot in most decks with no garnet or lock text (observed deck counts; restriction absence is inferred from missing text). |
Calculation
Weight profile: Utility / no clear role (default); no role blend. Intrinsic ≈ 40, Deck ≈ 39, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck
Strengths
- Consistently a single-copy inclusion across 400 sampled decks (observed)
- Portable across 82 archetypes, so it is not a niche pick (observed)
- Two-material fusion line is simple to read and deck-build (verified from description)
Weaknesses
- Effect text is missing from the evidence, so the core power cannot be verified (data gap)
- Zero combo boards recorded, so no measured conversion value (observed)
- Not a Top Card and no guide mentions, so there is no evidence of standout impact (observed)
Counters / choke points
- No counter data supplied; the card's effect is unknown, so specific answers cannot be named (speculation excluded)
Best use
Utility Fusion body; practical role is unverified without effect text. Decks: Red-Eyes, Blue-Eyes, Greed. Suggested copies: 1.
Evidence & gaps
- Verified: Fusion Monster, WIND Warrior, ATK 1200 / DEF 900 (card fields); Fusion materials: Armaill and One-Eyed Shield Dragon (description); Formats TCG, OCG, MasterDuel; no banlist token supplied
- Observed: Present in 400 of 400 sampled decks at 1 copy average; Spread across 82 distinct archetypes, top at 7.8% (Red-Eyes); Zero combo appearances; not a Top Card; Usage: 100% inclusion in Gravekeeper's and Flamvell at 1 copy
- Inferred: Access requires both named materials, so it is a Fusion-only route; Generic portability is real but the score is capped because the text reads as materials only; Effect-based value is unscored because effect text is missing
- Data gaps: effect text missing: only fusion materials supplied, so the effect cannot be decomposed no combos supplied; combo conversion is text-only inference no guides supplied no banlist token; assumed 3 copies (unlimited) deck data shows 400/400 inclusion with no combo presence, which is anomalous and should be verified against the source data